Urologic Surgical Associates of Delaware
We are pleased to announce our expanded office hours offering evening appointments on Tuesdays in addition to same day/next day appointments during 12-1pm. Please call us now for an appointment at (302) 571-8958 or by using our online appointment form.

USA Delaware is pleased to announce that Fran Schanne, MD, FACS has been voted a "2013 Top Doc" by the readers of Delaware Today.

We are proud to be the first urologists in Delaware to offer robotic surgery for prostate cancer, bladder cancer and kidney cancer using the da Vinci Surgical system.

Top Doctors
"Smooth Operators" article featuring Dr. Schanne!

Comcast NewsMakers
Featuring Dr. Schanne describing prostate cancer treatment using the da Vinci Surgical System.

News Archive

Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer generally does not cause any symptoms until it is extremely late stage and no longer curable. Because of the silent nature of prostate cancer, screening for prostate cancer is essential. Screening for prostate cancer involves identifying risk factors, obtaining a screening blood test called PSA (prostate specific antigen), and performing digital rectal examination. If the patient has risk factors such as an elevated PSA or an abnormal rectal exam, generally the next level of screening is a prostate needle biopsy. Risk factors for prostate cancer include age, family history, and African American descent. If a prostate needle biopsy confirms the presence of cancer of the prostate then several curative treatment options can be considered.

Overall, both radiotherapy and surgical removal of the prostate will result in cancer cure for 85% of patients. Conversely, overall patients can expect a 15% risk of cancer recurrence after either surgery or radiation. Prostate cancer recurrence after radiation has no proven effective currative therapy. Prostate cancer recurrence after surgery can be treated with radiation with a 50% cure rate.

Both of the curative treatment options carry risks. The two major forms of treatment are surgery and radiotherapy. There are two types of radiotherapy, seed implantion and external beam radiotherapy. In general all 3 forms of treatment :external beam radiation (EBR), seed implantation (SEEDS), and radical prostatectomy (RP) have some risk of erectile dysfunction. The likelihood of experiencing a decrease in your ability to obtain and maintain an erection with any of these treatment options is greatly impacted by your pre-existing erectile status. Any risk factors for erectile dysfunction that you may have now (such as increased age, diabetes, a history of smoking, vascular disease, etc) will increase the probability that you will experience a decrease in your erections after treatment. In general, SEEDS carries a 20-40% risk of decreasing your ability to obtain and maintain erections. EBR carries a 40-60% risk of decreasing erectile abilities. RP carries a 50-80% risk of decreasing your erectile abilities. If your cancer is particularly aggressive and requires bilateral wide excision of the neurovascular bundles your risk of erectile dysfunction with surgery is 100%.

Historically, these two distinct differences of effective treatment for recurrence after surgery versus better preservation of erectile function after seeds and radiotherapy have made the treatment choice for prostate cancer very challenging ("Do I keep my erections or do I maximize my ability to treat a possible recurrence of cancer?"). Recently, a newer technique, da Vinci Robotic Prostatectomy has shown data that is very convincing for excellent preservation of erectile function with surgical removal of the prostate. Excellent (but early) data out of Philadelphia and Detroit show erectile dysfunction rates similar to or better than that seen with seeds. If this data holds true over time it could mean that patients can choose surgical treatment for prostate cancer (using the da vinci robotic system) without having to experience a higher rate of erectile dysfunction than that seen with seed therapy.

Each of these treatment options can cause difficulties with urination after treatment. The radiation delivered to the prostate by EBR and/or SEEDS can cause irritative voiding symptoms and worsen the symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction. Because these treatment options are centered around leaving the prostate in place radiation can be a more challenging treatment option for men with an enlarged prostate. This is especially true if you have pre-existing symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction such as frequency of urination, getting up at night to urinate, and straining to urinate. For patients with a very large prostate and significant voiding symptoms special attention needs to be paid to the size of the prostate and the severity of the voiding symptoms. It may be necessary both in terms of symptom control and efficacy of the radiotherapy treatment, to reduce the volume of the prostate. Prostate volume reduction can be achieved prior to SEEDS or EBR by either hormonal ablation or a procedure to reduce prostate volume (such as KTP Laser Prostatectomy or TURP) or some combination of these treatments. For EBR and SEEDS there is a 10-20% risk of significant long term voiding dysfunction following the treatment. This risk is impacted by any pre-existing voiding dysfunction. Surgical removal of the prostate requires removing the prostate from the bladder and urethra. This necessitates a surgical procedure on or near the urinary sphincter. The urinary sphincter is the muscle responsible for maintaining urinary continence. Therefore, with radical removal of the prostate there is a 10-20% risk of suffering stress urinary incontinence. Stress urinary incontinence is a leakage of urine when you cough or sneeze or stand from a chair. There is a less than 2% risk that the incontinence occurs even without a stress event.

These treatment options also increase your risk of suffering a cardiovascular or pulmonary event during the treatment. That is, at any given time in your life there is a risk that you could have a heart attack or a stroke or pulmonary embolus. This risk is increased whenever your body is put under stress. The stress of undergoing EBR increases your risk of such an event very mildly. SEEDS requires an anesthetic and so this increases your risk of having such an adverse event slightly. Radical surgery requires approximately 3-4 hours under general anesthesia with a blood loss (50-400 cc for Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and da Vinci Robotic Prostatectomy, 400-1200 cc for Open Radical Prostatectomy) and so this increases the risk of such an adverse event by slightly more than seed implantation. Another way to look at this risk is that the risk of having a cardiovascular or pulmonary event during surgical removal of the prostate in an otherwise healthy male is similar to your risk of being injured in a car accident on your way to the doctor's office. If you are fairly healthy this risk is small and so it does not stop us from doing reasonable things but yet this risk is real.

EBR is generally delivered over 4-6 weeks as outpatient therapy. During this period the patient experiences some fatigue and is more likely to have voiding symptoms such as frequency, urgency, blood in the urine, pain with urination, and painful bowel movements. SEEDS is performed as outpatient surgery. Radical surgery to remove the prostate requires 1-2 days stay in the hospital. There may be a 2-4 day stay with open RP and the hospital stay is generally 1-2 days with daVinci Robotic Prostatectomy. With open RP a urinary catheter is required for 2-4 weeks. With daVinci Robotic Prostatectomy the catheter is generally removed in 3-7 days. The recovery of urinary control after open RP requires 2-3 months and with Laparoscopic or da Vinci robotic RP it takes zero 0-8 weeks. Twenty percent of Lap RP patients have urinary continence when the catheter comes out.

Of these three treatment options (EBR, SEEDS, RP) SEEDS offers perhaps the greatest convenience and ease of implementation. The data that is available on SEEDS would seem to indicate that for men who have low volume, low score disease it can be as effective as EBR and RP with less risk and more convienence. However, there is data that shows that for higher score disease, such as gleason score 3+4=7 or higher there is a higher rate of cancer recurrence and that these cancer recurrences occur earlier than they would with RP or EBR. EBR offers the advantage of not requiring anesthesia or a trip to the operating room. Cure rates for EBR and RP are very similar.

To make an informed and thorough decision about your prostate cancer treatment plan you should take into account your risk for extra capsular disease based on the nomograms (see our patient information brochure on Elevated PSA and Prostate Cancer with the Prostate Cancer Nomograms) and what your treatment options would be if indeed you have a cancer recurrence after your primary therapy. Regardless of your preoperative data and your chosen treatment plan you will have some risk of recurrence overall. The risk of cancer recurrence after any primary treatment for prostate cancer is roughly 15%. If your PSA is low and your gleason score is low and you have low volume disease (low volume disease is when only one or perhaps two of the biopsies specimens are positive for cancer), then your risk of recurrence is low. If you have high score, high PSA, high volume disease then your chance of recurrence is higher. The higher your risk of extracapsular disease on the nomograms the higher your risk of cancer recurrence after treatment with any of the three options. But no matter how favorable your preoperative data appears there is always some risk of recurrence. If your primary treatment is EBR or SEEDS then treatment for a potential cancer recurrence can be problematic. There are no proven curative treatments for cancer recurrence after EBR or SEEDS. Some urologists have done RP for cancer recurrence following radiotherapy of the Prostate. Surgery performed on a previously radiated prostate is extremely hazardous and carries great risk of significant complications (increased blood loss, possible need for urinary diversion) and so such surgery has largely been abandoned in the United States. Cryotherapy (freezing of the prostate) can be used for cancer recurrence after radiotherapy but it, too,carries significant risk. It has also not been proven to cure such post radiation recurrences.

If a patient has a cancer recurrence following RP (Open or Laparoscopic or da Vinci Robotic Prostatectomy) then EBR can be used. Such treatments generally carry a 50% cure rate. So, with EBR or SEEDS as primary therapy there is no proven treatment for a recurrence of prostate cancer. But, if RP is used as primary therapy then EBR can be used to treat a recurrence and such treatments have a 50% cure rate.